The C-suite’s emergency department optimization challenge

How can we help you?

*

Contact information

* This field is mandatory

Country

*

*

First name*

First name (phonetic)

*

Last name*

Last name (phonetic)

Salutation

Academic title

*

Email address*

Business phone

*

Company*

Job title

Industry

*

Function

*

Specialty

*

Department

*

State or Province

City

Address

Zip or Postal Code

By specifying your reason for contact we will be able to provide you with a better service.

We work with partners and distributors who may contact you about this Philips product on our behalf.

Follow up information

*

Preferred method of contact

Best time to call

Estimated time of purchase

*

Product of interest

*

Comments

What is cross border data transfer?

I agree on cross-border transfer of personal information.

CEE specific legal checkbox

CEE specific legal checkbox

I would like to receive marketing related electronic communications about Philips products, services, events and promotions that may be relevant to me based on my user preferences and behavior. I can revoke my consent at any time.

Final CEE consent

Trends in healthcare management

The C-suite’s Emergency Department Optimization Challenge
The C-suite’s Emergency Department Optimization Challenge
The C-suite’s Emergency Department Optimization Challenge

By Mark Feinberg, Managing Partner

This article was first published by Becker’s Hospital Review on October 21, 2016.

Introduction

Hospitals are under regulatory pressure to reduce emergency department (ED) costs, improve efficiency, and increase throughput capacity, which ultimately impact hospital revenue and patient satisfaction scores. As such, the ED has taken on a more prominent role as it interfaces with every department of the hospital and healthcare system in some form, impacting the patient healthcare journey overall. These key factors are driving the urgent need for ED optimization.

Nobody is having a good day when they go to the emergency department. The goal of ED optimization is to improve performance and quality measures while enhancing the overall patient experience. However, implementing best practices is not easy when EDs are similar but not identical, and each day and each patient case has commonalties but is rarely standard.

Key metrics in delivering emergency care

While every ED may be different in terms of volume, physical structure, staffing, and community/population needs, the metrics for measuring its effectiveness are not. A key driver for optimization is addressing regulatory mandates and improving performance metrics, which include:

Left Without Being Seen (LWBS) – low LWBS rates increases revenue for most EDs, helps to reduce safety risks and supports positive community perceptions;

Arrival to Provider – a key metric that leads to early assessment and intervention, helps mitigate risk, and is a key patient satisfaction driver;

Length of Stay (LOS) for Discharged and Admitted Patients – an important metric for reimbursement and patient satisfaction as well as a key driver for increased capacity;

Decision to Admit – this metric reflects the ability of the ED to provide timely admission to an inpatient bed with standardized coordination, communication, and collaboration across all lines and is a key driver to HCAHPS scores;

Patient Satisfaction – largely based on the admitted patient’s overall experience, the ED processes can affect HCAHPS scores with about 60% of inpatients beginning their experience in the ED; and

Revenue Increase – implementing best practices and innovative processes that decrease LWBS and LOS metrics and improve the patient experience helps support increased revenue, more positive community perception, and potential growth for the hospital.

Three key steps for ED optimization

Data –in and of itself– is not the remedy nor does it provide the complete picture of an ED’s performance. To be effective, data must be combined with assessment, observation, and analysis of the ED and how the staff works within it. Information must be effectively integrated within the ED and across the hospital. The approach to optimization generally focuses on three key areas: 1) front-end flow, 2) back-end patient disposition and discharge, and 3) integrating patient experience strategies.

Step one: Improve the front-end flow

The first step in ED optimization is always to focus on the front-end process of arrival and triage/assessment. Triage is the process of rapidly assessing and sorting patients to provide the right care, in the right priority order, and with the right provider to have the most positive outcome. These processes are intense and require a high skillset to perform the process effectively and efficiently.

Managing triage acuity levels is of the utmost importance in delivering emergency care and is really the ‘art and science’ of emergency nursing. The goal of optimization of front-end efforts is to get the patient to the provider for care as quickly as possible. This optimization of the triage processes also decreases patient “walk-a-ways” so the hospital captures additional revenue by treating more patients overall, both those that will be discharged from the ED and those that may incur a hospital stay.

Case in point: Lower walk-out rates drive patient satisfaction and revenue¹

A 408-bed community hospital with a history of high ED walk-out rates and multiple process improvement attempts to resolve the issues was failing at maintaining acceptable rates. The 68,000-annual-visit ED had tried a series of rapid improvement events (RIEs). The implementation of these initiatives was not consistent or sustained, resulting in minimal impact on LWBS and patient satisfaction.

Working with Philips Blue Jay Consulting, the hospital was able to greatly reduce arrival-to-triage times as well as improve arrival-to-room by 37% and arrival-to-provider by 44%. Subsequently, patient satisfaction rates increased 334% to the 100th percentile and the likelihood of recommending the ED increased 109% to the 88th percentile. Most importantly, the hospital was able to decrease LWBS by 41%, which generated over $1.2 million in collectable revenue annually.

Step two: Manage admission patient volume better

The second key step focuses on back-end processes from the decision to admit until the patient is placed in an inpatient bed. Many hospitals struggle with limited inpatient capacity, hospital length-of-stays, and competition for the beds with higher ED and surgical/procedural volumes. As a result, emergency department crowding and boarding is common.

Several areas are critical to improving the ability to manage patient volume including more consistency with patient admission and discharge practices, coordination between the ED and other departments, and standardization of bed management. Process improvements can help increase access to available beds and streamline bed management processes in order to move patients through the ED and hospital more effectively.

Step three: Integrate patient experience strategies

The third step is the integration of the patient experience into all facets of the performance improvement efforts. This involves ED staff and provider education programs that focus on specific patient-centered tactics while increasing efficiency and effectiveness of care as well as enhancements to the patient environment.

It is important to first understand the patient’s journey in the ED and evaluate the clinical environment from a holistic perspective. Utilizing a data-driven and structured approach, healthcare providers can more readily pinpoint issues and begin to effectively align clinical workflows, technology, and resources to create long-term strategies for improvement.

ED optimization benefits

The patient experience in the ED has a significant impact on HCAHPS scores. There is research to support the correlation between the perceived care by an admitted ED patient and how that patient responds to his/her satisfaction survey once discharged from the hospital (American College of Emergency Physicians, Patient Satisfaction, June 2011). If the patient has a negative experience in the ED they will rate care lower, which is driving the c-suite to improve the patient experience in the ED. By equipping staff with the tools and support for respectful, informative interactions with patients, hospitals can increase patient recommendation and loyalty scores.

We invite you to read the first part in this article series at Urgent need for emergency department optimization

Read the article as published by Becker’s Hospital Review at The C-suite’s emergency department optimization challenge
Urgent Need for Emergency Department Optimization
Urgent Need for Emergency Department Optimization

Urgent Need for Emergency Department Optimization

By Mark Feinberg, Managing Partner and
Suzanne Stone-Griffith, MSN, RN, CNAA, Principal and Practice Operations Lead

This article was first published by Becker’s Hospital Review on November 9, 2016.

Introduction

Universally, the appropriate utilization and optimization of Emergency Departments (EDs) is a complex challenge. The unpredictable nature of the ED and the chaotic, high-stress environment make best-practice improvements difficult to pinpoint or standardize. The lack of sufficient medical homes is contributing to patient volume increasing as more people are continuing to use the ED as the first place to go for care.

Increasingly, the ED has become the “front door” of the hospital and the 24/7-entry point for both the insured and uninsured with every ailment ranging from a life-threatening car accident or heart attack to gastroenteritis or a broken ankle.

The business of running an ED

When every second counts, improving ED efficiency is critical. Every hospital is focused on increasing throughput capacity to treat as many patients as they can as quickly and effectively as possible. This is important not just from a patient outcome perspective but a hospital reimbursement and revenue standpoint as well. Many EDs are based on a model that reimburses on metrics such as length of stay (LOS) and wait times for patients so they are incentivized to get patients in and out of the emergency department while meeting standardized national quality measures.

Beyond the key goal of performance optimization, some hospitals are extending the strategy of the ED to address larger value-based population health issues and strive to treat the patient in the most appropriate care setting from a cost standpoint. The goal of these hospitals, ultimately, is to keep patients out of the ED from the beginning and have them go to a point-of-care setting that is more appropriate with their clinical situation such as a physician’s office or an urgent care center. This approach requires a shift in focus from volume to value and must address nuances in particular population health issues. Healthcare executives must consider how they can appropriately shift patients with minor issues such as a fever or limited injuries to a more appropriate setting effectively.

For the c-suite, this means thinking more strategically about the motivation of their particular ED and how it affects the larger hospital/health care system. The answers to these questions require a thorough market and demographic analysis, insight and clinical expertise that are often found with the help of strategic partners to make data-driven decisions. Regardless if the hospital or system focus is volume-based or value-based, healthcare executives are dealing with similar issues around appropriate utilization of ED resources and determining what works best for their particular hospital, patient population, or region.

Urgent need for data-driven decisions

To improve ED performance metrics, hospital executives need to have access to meaningful performance data within the ED and other strategic departments and ensure the validity of the data to affect meaningful change. Using robust data analytics, hospital leaders can work with strategic partners to create a data-driven assessment and near real time metrics dashboard to provide high-level and detailed information on key performance metrics as well as identify areas that are performing well or require intervention. Data-driven decisions are essential to ED optimization and improving the key regulatory performance metrics by which EDs are assessed.

Case in point: Improve metrics, increase revenue

A 460-bed community hospital with a history of unsustainable success in process improvement was not meeting its ED expected performance and wait time targets. The 48,000-annual-visits ED had previously tried to address the issues by developing a fast track program, followed by a model where a mid-level provider would initiate workups on select low acuity patients. Neither initiative took hold nor had the impact on flow that the organization sought.

Working with Philips Blue Jay Consulting, the hospital was able to better assess issues and collect relevant data to identify two major areas of opportunity: revising front-end processes and re-aligning staff resources away from a serial model of care. Based on this critical data, the hospital was able to make key changes to patient care and flow. As a result, the department realized significant improvement in arrival to triage (68%) and arrival to room (77%) as compared to their baseline. Additionally, there was a 51% decrease in the number of patients who left the ED without treatment. The decrease in ED walk-a-ways generated additional collectable revenue of over $2 million annually for the organization.

The ED of the future

The emergency department of the future must be optimized from both the business side and the patient side and viewed not only within the ED but also as it compares or competes with other EDs outside of the hospital. To truly optimize performance, hospital executives must delve deeper into areas of discovery on utilization patterns, acuity patterns, and population trends over time. While patient volume may appear unpredictable in the short-term, if it is analyzed over time volume patterns can be more easily anticipated for the future.

Looked at in this way, it’s clear that more insight can be revealed to further ED optimization. Many hospitals are enlisting strategic partners to help address these complex challenges, train on best practice recommendations, and support the implementation to sustain meaningful change. As the ED becomes the new “face” of the hospital and strategic community partners, its overall success, its optimization and importance in delivering care cannot be overlooked. With long-term sustainable transformation of the ED, healthcare organizations can regain potentially lost revenue while elevating the level of care and increasing patient satisfaction.

We invite you to read the next part in this article series at The C-suite’s emergency department optimization challenge

Read the article as published by Becker’s Hospital Review at The C-suite’s emergency department optimization challenge

Meet our team

Mark Feinberg
Managing Partner, North America
Healthcare Transformation Services

Mark leads our consulting practice in North America. He brings 25+ years of experience in healthcare, leading client engagements focused on operational effectiveness, patient throughput, supply chain optimization,pharmacy improvement, case management, interim emergency department (ED) management, and perioperative services. He brings a critical eye and significant management expertise to each project. He co-founded Blue Jay Consulting in 2006 which was acquired by Philips in 2015. Trained as an emergency medical ambulance technician, Mark holds a master's degree in business and is a published author on ED operations strategy and performance improvement.

Learn more about our consulting services

Contact us

Related Capabilities

Learn more about our healthcare transformation services for your organization.

Customer stories in Healthcare management

Innovation Matters blog

@PhilipsHealth

News

* Results are rates measured prior to this engagement compared to rates measured at the end or after the engagement was completed. Results from case studies are not predictive of results in other cases. Results in other cases may vary.